Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Elements 5.0 Versus Lightroom 1.0
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue Jan 30 17:16:01 2007
References: <000401c744b6$866dd4f0$6501a8c0@asus930> <C1E50464.EB25%heninger@adobe.com>

So a question....

If LR does so much good stuff, and PS is made by the same company, why did 
Adobe not include the neat features of LR into PS?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net 

Lightroom is so
much more efficient than PS or PSE and some of the new tools (targeted
adjustment, curve manipulations) are so liberating after years of goofy
adjustment layers and the like...well, I don't look back much except when
some major work is needed.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w a d e  h e n i n g e r
u s e r  e x p e r i e n c e
a d o b e  s y s t e m s ,  i n c





Replies: Reply from heninger at adobe.com (Wade Heninger) ([Leica] Elements 5.0 Versus Lightroom 1.0)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Elements 5.0 Versus Lightroom 1.0)
Message from heninger at adobe.com (Wade Heninger) ([Leica] Elements 5.0 Versus Lightroom 1.0)