Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Luis, you asked about the "decent" price I paid. It was right at 200 dollars with shipping. It is in beautiful shape. Daniel On 1/28/07, Luis Ripoll <luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote: > Jim, > > I absolutely agree with the " ....Summitar _is_ a very underestimated lens. > I liked it like that (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at a > decent price...." > > For curiosity....what do you mind for a decent price?, I've paid for mine > about 200$, and I'm fully satisfied with it, please look at these examples: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210114 > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5210116 > > I think you and me ... And many other Luggers we have a lot of things in > common, ahhhh! The romantic old stuff! Is like a old whisky more than 18 > years old!, that I like very much too! > > Saludos cordiales > Luis > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de > Daniel Ridings > Enviado el: domingo, 28 de enero de 2007 21:44 > Para: Leica Users Group > Asunto: Re: [Leica] IMG: PAW 4 dlridings > > Thanks Don, Jim and Luis, > > Don ... I'm glad you suggested that. I guess you could tell I was a little > unsure about these. There was something in them that I liked, but I hadn't > succeeded in pulling it out. It was something abstract that I felt was > there. I felt that when I saw them, before I took them, I just couldn't put > my finger on it. > > Jim, the Summitar _is_ a very underestimated lens. I liked it like that > (before) because it allowed me to pick one up at a decent price. > > The bokeh can get dominating when you shoot it wide-open at close focus, > but > once you get the hang of it, it is a nice lens, no doubt about it. > > Thanks all! > Daniel > > > On 1/28/07, Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote: > > Daniel, > > I rather like the bottom image. Take a look at it with the background > > line of trees cropped out; it becomes a more interesting abstract to my > eyes. > > > > Don > > don.dory@gmial.com > > > > On 1/28/07, Daniel Ridings <dlridings@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > It's been a cold, damp week: > > > > > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2007/4.html > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >