Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 28 vignette
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Tue Jan 16 22:07:01 2007
References: <322EB138-3451-42BA-83B9-FD7D8261AD05@comcast.net><000a01c736c1$979d1270$6401a8c0@FrankDell2><8EB3FBCD-FF39-4930-93CF-60B557CDEDB9@comcast.net><001401c736d5$2ad3dc50$6401a8c0@FrankDell2><4095A8A6-0331-4330-ACB2-B052AB82BE4C@comcast.net><00a701c737f3$0c0e68c0$6401a8c0@FrankDell2><6DB4B82F-A597-4D12-BAE0-86F368605BA9@comcast.net><00ae01c73807$cd464710$6401a8c0@FrankDell2><5ACED518-149C-4809-A403-631FDD7C0C5B@comcast.net><00c101c7384f$2c9d8100$6401a8c0@FrankDell2><3DF91CBA-8205-420B-A160-49884CBF823D@comcast.net><00c501c73862$f7d1f0f0$6401a8c0@FrankDell2><4CC763DA-184E-415F-A40D-223D83786402@comcast.net><001401c738fb$a83b3df0$6501a8c0@asus930><709DDA85-43B3-4853-952D-3A71637CFA81@mac.com><p06230929c1d2bf7e49ed@[10.1.16.144]><01d001c739b1$a9c345d0$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <01f901c739f8$bb23d9b0$6401a8c0@FrankDell2>

Sounds right, Frank. The ultimate test of course is that we need some folks 
to post some pics from other lenses. I just went back
and found a good example from similar circumstances to my previous posts. 
However more even lighting and I think more correct
exposure, The others I posted were very saturated and probably 1 stop or so 
under to that end. I can detect NO fall off in ANY
corner.
I'm not sure if I'm beating a dead horse here or if it is still of interest 
to some. I'll post again if anyone comes up with some
other pics.

Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Filippone
Sent: Wednesday, 17 January 2007 15:31
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Leica] 28 vignette

OK.. I took a look....  The Zeiss Biogon 28/2.8 vs the Leica ASPH Elmarit 
28/2.8.

By looking at the charts of MTF at full open ( F2.8):   It looks like the 
Leica lens is far superior.... less fall off.
At F5.6 .......same conclusion....


I do not read these charts well, so I could be wrong, but it appears the 
Leica lens is a better performer for light falloff in the
corners......

I also looked at the F2 ASPH Summicron......The Leica lens still looks 
better......

So, if one were interested in vignetting being minimized, Either Leica lens 
would outperform the Zeiss Biogon.

Frank Filippone
red735i@earthlink.net 



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 28 vignette)
In reply to: Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] 400mm f6.8 Telyt problem)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] 400mm f6.8 Telyt problem)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 400mm f6.8 Telyt problem)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] 28 vignette)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] 28 vignette)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 28 vignette)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 28 vignette)