Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Namche Market: focal zone
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Sun Jan 7 15:11:08 2007
References: <001201c73222$d74e53a0$6501a8c0@asus930> <074F7618-81D0-4975-8B39-E7C91A87FFBF@ncable.net.au> <6CAE5824-CCB5-41EE-9553-53433C4C2453@mindspring.com> <006d01c73275$2f9058e0$a302a8c0@ted>

Thanks Ted, I will work on the burning ideas in the darkroom sometime. I
find that a little burn can often dampen an area nicely. You are right
about the arm: I did not notice it while shooting. Why can't these models
behave themselves :-)


thanks for the comments: its a long way to go to repeat the job, but I'd
love to

Cheers

> Alastair showed:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Namche Market: focal zone
>
>>Here is one I was sure was going to be a winner: M6 with the 90 or  135,
>>looking down on the market watching the guy in the foreground  go through
>>his sales pitch: the deal is almost done when I took  this image: I
>> focused
>>on the "action", but the stupa in the  background is therefore out of the
>>range of the DOF. Being white  big, does it draw the eye and destroy the
>>image, ie is the out  of focus part too dominant and distracting?
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alastair/album184/
>>album119/2004Nepal152.jpg.html>
>>>
>>> http://www.tiny.cc/USQHR
>
> G'day Alastair,
> The eyes unfortunately distract more than they add, certainly as we see it
> here!
>
> BUT! Right where your main subject stands bartering there's an arm lower
> left corner with pointing finger sticking into the frame. Not something
> you
> might catch when shooting due to concentration on eyes and trying to get a
> good depth of sharpness.
>
> It's a minor point, but once seen it becomes quite obvious sticking in.:-(
>
> I think a one stop smaller aperture might've made it work if it still
> allowed a high enough shutter speed to avoid camera shake.
>
> Another thought.Try burning down the eye building to almost the head level
> of the people, very subtly as you don't want to make it so obvious that
> the
> burn down becomes distracting.
>
> But what bugs me more than the eyes is the damn arm sticking in right at
> the
> crucial point of people action. :-( Try burning this down, if possible
> without adding to the distraction.
>
> The overall scene is one that could be milked with a whole roll of film
> watching for different moments in the foreground that work with the eyes.
> But that's for the next trip as you don't want to use the whole potential
> up
> on the first go around! ;-)
>
> ted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: Hoppy images)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Namche Market: focal zone)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Namche Market: focal zone)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Namche Market: focal zone)