Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A tripod, an M8, and two candles - do some science
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun Jan 7 12:12:13 2007
References: <4cfa589b0701071032n490690d5o1798cb7998dece73@mail.gmail.com><012001c7328f$48f97a90$6101a8c0@jimnichols> <9b678e0701071130h417371bdxfab5942b54827f8d@mail.gmail.com>

Don,

Enough said.  Time to move on.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] A tripod, an M8, and two candles - do some science


> Jim,
> The laws of physics do not change and light of different wave lengths
> focuses at different points.  Modern glasses help a lot in this especially
> if properly balanced with anomalous dispersion glass.  But, and this is a
> big on, is that this only holds for a given set of wave lengths.  Two
> extreme examples would be a lens that could focus X-rays not being the hot
> ticket for normal light and the lenses that are used in steppers.  These 
> are
> optimized for one frequency of light used to etch the lines on the chips.
> Totally useless outside of a very narrow wavelength of light.
>
> Let's go back to Brian's and Steve's images.  Brian used a Noctilux which
> was a heavily compromised design to generate good imagery at F1 on film
> without using aspheric elements.  For the use it was intended it is a
> masterpiece.  It was never intended to do well with very long wavelengths 
> of
> light.  Moving on to Steve's images, they are much crisper and seem in
> better focus.  Probably due to a much more modern design that handles 
> longer
> wavelengths with more panache.
>
> Last, to pull a Ted; geesh guys, get a life.  The new sensor handles light
> differently than we are used to.  Non panchromatic films don't look the
> same, neither does Ektachrome look like Kodachrome.  For most applications
> the M8 delivers an amazing wonderful image that is very sharp out of the 
> box
> with out the built in sharpening from Nikon or the need to sharpen due to 
> an
> aggressive anti-aliasing filter in Canon.
>
> Maybe I should buy three or four of these things and leave them in the box
> to fund my retirement ala a two lug M5 NOS or a black paint SP.  :)
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
> On 1/7/07, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> I went back and reviewed the Noctilux data that Brian posted earlier
>> today.
>> There does not appear to be a separate "R" index on the Noctilux for use
>> in
>> infrared photography.  I recall being told some time ago that the 
>> separate
>> index was no longer needed on recent Leica lenses because the color
>> correction has improved to the point that IR is rendered properly when
>> using
>> the normal focusing index.  If this is true, then one should be able to
>> focus properly using visible light, regardless of the nature of the light
>> source.  Maybe someone can elaborate on this.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Adam Bridge" <abridge@gmail.com>
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 12:32 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] A tripod, an M8, and two candles - do some science
>>
>>
>> > If infra red is really a prime illuminate in the image then the focus
>> > will be shifted because of the substantially longer wavelengths of the
>> > IR. So you'd expect the focus to be "off" - if it weren't I'd be
>> > thinking IR wasn't an issue.
>> >
>> > I'd like to see some rigorous science done here - creating a
>> > thoughtful series of controlled experiments to explore what is being
>> > observed and determine the meaning.
>> >
>> > Adam
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/7/07, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >> Brian,
>> >>
>> >> I don't wish to get into the definition of depth  of field or 
>> >> allowable
>> >> circles of confusion.  However, if you go to the full size image in 
>> >> the
>> >> second photo, you will notice that the highlights on the rim of the
>> neck
>> >> of
>> >> the oil candle are not nearly as sharp as the highlights on the frame
>> in
>> >> the
>> >> background.  This is what led me to state that the sharpest focus is
>> >> behind
>> >> the candle flame.
>> >>
>> >> Jim Nichols
>> >> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Brian Reid" <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>> >> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> >> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 11:49 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] A tripod, an M8, and two candles
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> I am assuming that you were careful not to change the focus between
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> two shots.
>> >> >
>> >> > Correct.
>> >> >
>> >> >> I notice in the second shot that the frame in the background seems
>> to
>> >> >> be
>> >> >> the plane in focus.  The IR effects are interesting, but I do not
>> >> >> think
>> >> >> that you have eliminated the focus question.
>> >> >
>> >> > According to the manual that came with the Noctilux, the depth of
>> field
>> >> > at
>> >> > f/5.6 at that distance (1.5 meters) is about 22cm. I believe I have
>> >> > eliminated the focus question.
>> >> >
>> >> > (
>> http://www.leica-camera.us/assets/file/download.php?filename=file_153.pdf,
>> >> > page 6)
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Leica Users Group.
>> >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Leica Users Group.
>> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] A tripod, an M8, and two candles - do some science)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] A tripod, an M8, and two candles - do some science)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] A tripod, an M8, and two candles - do some science)