Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]i agree. i ended up acquiring both 400 and 560 televit and trombone setups but it took years and the willingness to buy "outfits" with redundant peices. for example, both 400 and 560 televits were acquired as separate outfits, but having two televit bodies wasn't a problem as i also had a 280/f4.8 which mounts (via an adapter which must separately be sought out) onto the visoflex body. that 280 used to be on a focorapid, but i also happened to have a 200 which now sits on the focorapid. for (relatively simple) lenses of this type, the "'bay" has been my most successful stalking grounds, and i think i might also have picked up some things from the LHSA quarterly swap catalog. -rei On Dec30 12:41, A. Lal wrote: > The 5.6/560 and 400/5.6 will not fit the 6.8 mounts. > > IME the 5,6/560 is harder to find than the 6.8. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net> > To: "Leica-Users-Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Saturday, 30 December, 2006 11:18 AM > Subject: [Leica] Visoflex and Televit Lens Head Interchangeability > > > >I have a 400 F6.8 Telyt Lens for a Visoflex III. Now I am searching for a > >560 head unit to fit the same back end. What choices do I > >have? Would a lens made for the Televit mate properly? > > > > > >Frank Filippone > >red735i@earthlink.net > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Leica Users Group. > >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey