Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: The slippery slope - "digital"?
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Sun Dec 24 15:02:30 2006
References: <122420060648.18664.458E22CD0002D040000048E82200735446040C02019C990E04@comcast.net> <003d01c7276b$5857ee10$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <90F81225-0877-4E49-92F2-BDFED32226B1@comcast.net> <9b678e0612241452x6758b13s3e94c4f025e0a1d1@mail.gmail.com>

Don,

I can't imagine that at all. It's over double the weight of the 200.  
It even makes my AF-I 400 a lightweight.

Len


On Dec 24, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Don Dory wrote:

> You should have lifted the 300 f2 then.  :)
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
> On 12/24/06, Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> The 200 f2 is a Nikon masterpiece. A beautiful hunk of glass. I still
>> find it a little heavy though. I wouldn't walk around without at
>> least a mono pod for over a half hour. I had it for 6 months and
>> ended up trading it in for a new M7 and 50 Summilux. I still wish I
>> had it though. I just found I could not justify having it for the
>> type of photography I do.
>>
>> By the way I know a fellow who has 5 EF200 f1.8 lenses new in the
>> box. He won't sell them though. And he's not a dealer.
>>
>> Len
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 24, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Christopher Williams wrote:
>>
>> > Not only a 200/f2, but a VR 200/f2. :) And it's not as big as you'd
>> > think.
>> >
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: <mcyclwritr@comcast.net>
>> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 1:48 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [Leica] The slippery slope - "digital"?
>> >
>> >
>> >> Zounds, a fast 200mm to which even Nikonoids may cleave.
>> >>
>> >> -Chris Lawson, wondering if the Bokeh King EF200mm f/1.8L will
>> >> soon crash dive from rare and amazing to just plain oboslete. And
>> > amazing.
>> >>
>> >>  From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com>
>> >>> The Japanese optical industry is/has removed lead especially and
>> >>> most other
>> >>> heavy(toxic) metals from their optical glass over the last five
>> >>> years or
>> >>> so.  The hazards to the workers in the smelters became too
>> >>> apparant to
>> >>> tolerate any more.  The Canon folks assured me that as they
>> >>> figured out
>> >>> optical glasses that don't use toxic materials they would re-
>> >>> issue a similar
>> >>> lens; with the good success of the Nikon 200 F2 you can bet that
>> >>> Canon will
>> >>> bring out a revised version fairly soon.
>> >>>
>> >>> 0.02
>> >>>
>> >>> Don
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>> information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from allen.graves at charter.net (Allen Graves) ([Leica] Re: The slippery slope - "digital"?)
In reply to: Message from mcyclwritr at comcast.net (mcyclwritr@comcast.net) ([Leica] The slippery slope - "digital"?)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: The slippery slope - "digital"?)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Re: The slippery slope - "digital"?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: The slippery slope - "digital"?)