Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] question for nathan
From: michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema)
Date: Fri Dec 22 08:37:30 2006
References: <5fe055490612212012h398c1891m682a40837e563b4c@mail.gmail.com> <458B7030.8050209@nathanfoto.com> <09ae01c72590$8fdbbf10$1046507b@Nelson> <458B7DE1.7010007@nathanfoto.com> <5fe055490612220546x486a2e8fme618d832e9228230@mail.gmail.com>
 
leo wesson wrote:
> Nathan,
> 
> Thanks for the info, I am also interested in one of the bronicas.  How 
> would
> you relate the lens "feel" for the 2 lenses you have?  The 45, kind of like
> a 24?  60 kind of like a 35?
> 

Hi Leo,

I'd say the 45 is close to 28 and the 60 is about 40. the 100 is close 
to 60.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema
Replies: Reply from lwwesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] question for nathan)
 In reply to: Message from lwwesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] question for nathan)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] question for nathan)
Message from cchan at pldtdsl.net (Nelson Chan) ([Leica] question for nathan)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] question for nathan)
Message from lwwesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] question for nathan)