Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] High ISOs Comparison
From: xrogers at comcast.net (Clyde Rogers)
Date: Fri Dec 8 07:44:19 2006
References: <A60E7CFF-A5DD-4A0E-BB3C-7324CEC5BBCA@comcast.net> <00e801c71a14$6908f010$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <7.0.1.0.2.20061207144539.027f5450@infoave.net> <027473DB-BFFD-4A76-859B-36FDB50D2B17@mac.com>
 
Don't worry.  Whatever bit the data is, I (and many others) have  
wrenched the daylights out of some of these files just to force the  
histograms go bad, and they certainly hang together as well as any  
others.  They are very resilient raw files.

Clyde Rogers

On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:16 AM, m4y@mac.com wrote:
> Yikes! 8 bit! I may have to rethink my upcoming purchase.
>
> Do the histograms fall apart when you stress them? I am NOT paying  
> an M8 price for that kind of rubbish. My 2 year old Sony toy does  
> better than that. I might as well just keep it if that's the case.
>
> But I have my heart set on the M8. Please tell me it isn't so!
>
> Thanks,
> Dom
Replies: Reply from m4y at mac.com (m4y@mac.com) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
 In reply to: Message from xrogers at comcast.net (Clyde Rogers) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from m4y at mac.com (m4y@mac.com) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)