Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Math Question
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Dec 6 12:57:38 2006
References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061206152403.027b4508@infoave.net> <45772DC5.3040508@mcclary.net>
 
666 I'd say.


Op 6-dec-06, om 21:53 heeft Harrison McClary het volgende geschreven:

> Tina Manley wrote:
>> LUG:
>>
>> If I take a photo at ISO 160 but underexpose by two stops, what is  
>> the effective ISO that I'm using?  How about three stops under?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tina
>
>
> 640
>
> -- 
> Harrison McClary
> Harrison McClary Photography
> harrison@mcclary.net
> http://www.mcclary.net
> ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography
> http://www.imagestocksouth.com
> Tobacco Road: Personal Blog:
> http://web.mac.com/whmcclary/iWeb/tobacco-road/Blog/Blog.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from harrison at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Math Question)
 In reply to: Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Math Question)
Message from harrison at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Math Question)