Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Steve, I think that you have hit the nail on the head. The problem with the building is that it is - as Henning said - mechano-complex inside, but also with a sense of space. The first illustrates the complexity, the second the space. There is a subsidiary question: which better illustrates the building? the first shows the interior and its structure, the second is perhaps graphically more interesting, but could be almost anywhere. My preference has moved towards the second I think, perhaps. Peter Steve Barbour wrote: > Peter Dzwig said and showed... > >>> Two views of the interior of the same building: Richard Rodger's St. >>> Katahrine's House >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/PeterDzwig/album347/ >>> StKatharinesHouse-2200611.jpg.html >>> >>> and >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/PeterDzwig/album347/ >>> StKatharine_sHouseInterior.jpg.html >>> >>> Leica IIIf 3.5 cm Summaron, f3.5 at 1/60th KOdak BW 400 CN, >>> artificial light - no flash >>> >>> I am having difficulty choosing; so help and constructive criticism >>> are as always welcome. > > > after multiple looks I find I much prefer the second... it seems light > and airy... and the alignment is fine... > > (the first seems slightly rotated to the left... a little disconcerting) > > thanks, Steve > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >