Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams)
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Fri Nov 17 14:47:36 2006
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36013F1C7E@case-email><016701c709ef$b8ccc610$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto><F6BFFFF5-010E-1000-FAF5-0290FABCA12F-Webmail-10010@mac.com><011c01c70a98$85d56510$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <7.0.1.0.2.20061117173807.024a1620@infoave.net>
Oh no, the discussion was prime zooms so I just stated those zoom lenses.
Non zoom lenses I use with digital are the 10.5 f/2.8, 85/1.8, and 180/2.8.
With weddings, the zooms are just a helluva lot easier, less lens changes.
And the 2.8's are damn good.
And of course there's no Leica prime 2.8 zoom for an M.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tina Manley"
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses,and their value today
(ChrisWillliams)
> At 05:34 PM 11/17/2006, you wrote:
> >For film weddings, Leica M6 and 35/f2, 50/f2 most of the time.
> >
> >Chris
>
> Chris - Why are you using prime lenses with film but not with
> digital? Just curious.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
In reply to:
Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Exceptional lenses, and their value today)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (Chris Willliams))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams))
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams))