Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams)
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri Nov 17 14:39:53 2006
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36013F1C7E@case-email> <016701c709ef$b8ccc610$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <F6BFFFF5-010E-1000-FAF5-0290FABCA12F-Webmail-10010@mac.com> <011c01c70a98$85d56510$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>
At 05:34 PM 11/17/2006, you wrote:
>For film weddings, Leica M6 and 35/f2, 50/f2 most of the time.
>
>Chris
Chris - Why are you using prime lenses with film but not with
digital? Just curious.
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams))
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams))
In reply to:
Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Exceptional lenses, and their value today)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (Chris Willliams))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams))