Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] chimping, now Leica Sins
From: bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen)
Date: Thu Nov 16 09:49:08 2006

I don't think it's so much that it is "the thing," Doug, as it is that it is
the standard. And for most - not all - photographers and uses, there's the
fact that an auto focus lens can be manually focused, while a manual focus
lens can't be automatically focused.  So for people with autofocus bodies,
manual focus lenses usually don't make much sense - which is why so many
unquestionably great lenses go begging for homes.


On 11/16/06 11:41 AM, "telyt@earthlink.net" <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:

> <allen.graves@charter.net> wrote:
> 
>> It is really remarkable how little interest there is in some of the
> really high 
>> quality manual focus SLR lenses there is now.
> 
> Kinda like how much interest there was in RF cameras in the 1960s, when
> SLRs were The Thing.  Now, AF is The Thing; never mind that for many
> critical applications manual focus gives better results, if it ain't AF it
> ain't marketable.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (telyt@earthlink.net) ([Leica] chimping, now Leica Sins)