Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] three...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu Nov 9 09:33:35 2006
References: <532BF1A3-3399-4CBF-876B-3AE46CF62589@cox.net> <64F758AC-8DBB-4B52-A4B9-D4CD8C97FAC4@pandora.be>

On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Philippe Orlent wrote:

> I think this one is a keeper: it is not a shot that will be  
> appreciated by traditionalists, but that alone is already a big pro...


thanks Philippe ,   yes...my thoughts too...

Steve
>
> Thanks for showing,
> Philippe
>
>
>
> Op 9-nov-06, om 01:48 heeft Steve Barbour het volgende geschreven:
>
>> either in spite of, or because of,  its faults.... I like this  
>> image...
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/three.jpg.html
>>
>>
>> I just go by my gut, but I'm wondering if others more  
>> photographically inclined may have helpful comments...
>>
>> thanks for looking,
>>
>> and your thoughts,
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] three...)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] three...)