Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue Nov 7 13:15:21 2006
References: <00c401c70155$4d761260$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <454EB466.3090205@eth.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061106070325.024ecdb0@infoave.net> <454FDF93.7050900@eth.net> <002401c7021d$b4461f30$a302a8c0@ted> <455008FC.5000207@eth.net> <f325c83c5812.454fb8da@shaw.ca> <455097CF.7000707@waltjohnson.com> <cc5fba703a3d.45507c54@shaw.ca> <4550E0A6.2040006@waltjohnson.com>
At 02:38 PM 11/7/2006, you wrote:
>That's a good point about sight unseen. If Leica needs to stay in
>the market they won't do it with 5k digitals. Price will either drop
>or the company will. There is always the possibility some on the LUG
>will decide to sell theirs, right Tina? :-)
I've never sold anything Leica that I didn't regret later, but if
they come out with an M9, I might consider selling the M8 ;-) It's
not like selling my M3 to buy an M6 ;-)
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
http://www.tinamanley.com
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)