Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 2500 ISO
From: gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO)
Date: Tue Nov 7 11:31:48 2006
References: <00c401c70155$4d761260$6401a8c0@FrankDell2> <454EB466.3090205@eth.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061106070325.024ecdb0@infoave.net> <454FDF93.7050900@eth.net> <002401c7021d$b4461f30$a302a8c0@ted> <455008FC.5000207@eth.net> <f325c83c5812.454fb8da@shaw.ca> <455097CF.7000707@waltjohnson.com>
Walt Johnson writes in part:
> I think he had a valid basis for his criticism. Time will tell, but look
> at the Leitz shenanigans just in the last few years. From M6 to M6TTl
> to M7 and then back to the M3 or was that MP? Marketing nonsense, not
> tools for working professionals.
I don't disagree with the conclusion that the M8 is high priced. it is one
reason why I'm not buying one (sight unseen). Perceived value and price are
two different things.
Also, I won't be running out of 135 and 120 film stock any time soon.
Greg J. Lorenzo
Calgary, Alberta
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from jgovindaraj at eth.net (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] 2500 ISO)