Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am certainly not claiming that they are deceitful - or that the person who posted info earlier is - I just don't understand it. I would take the 6 bit/64 lenses idea if one of the lenses that they won't put the coding on wasn't an earlier (e.g., mid-1980s) Summicron 50. In terms of Exif data a "Summicron 50mm f/2.0" is a "Summicron 50mm f/2.0" is a "Summicron 50mm f/2.0".... isn't it? Dave Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> writes: >> I'm just curious why Leica claims not >> to be able to put the coding on older lenses if its just to put a text >> string in the EXIF data. It doesn't make any sense. > > I start with the assumption that Leica is not being deceitful. > You can call them a lot of things, but manipulative and deceitful is not > one of them. > I have to assume that they have a reason to do this. > > Here's what I think. A 6-bit code can identify no more than 64 different > lenses. I'd be willing to bed that since the release of the M3 50 years > ago, Leica has issued maybe 50 different kinds of lenses. If they were > willing to put 6-bit codes on all of them, they'd only have room for a > dozen new lenses and then the code would be full. > > So I think if I were them, I'd pick about 20 to 30 of the more modern > lenses and assign them code numbers, and reserve the remaining 30 to 40 > numbers for products that they haven't shipped yet. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information