[Leica] LUG membership

[jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith)]

Wouldn't you know that the LUG age chart resembles someone flipping the bird
(what do they call that in Australia, and the UK?)

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
http://400tx.blogspot.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jim
Nichols
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 6:12 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG membership


Jeffery,

Here is the bar graph we accumulated in November 2004, and, at that time, 
the sampling showed that people in their 50s were in the lead as LUG 
members.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Lug.gif.html
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342@cox.net>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 5:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] LUG membership


> Actually, I meant the average age of Leica subscribers would be 50. 
> ;-)
>
> If I were a statistician with a lot of time on my hands, I would go 
> back
> and
> see which proportion of posts were pure Leica and which were digital, war,
> Scotch, etc.
>
> But Leica is doing okay compared to some others. The CVUG and RF lists
> used
> to have quite a few posts. Lately, you can hear the crickets on those
> forums.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of G 
> Hopkinson
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 4:48 PM
> To: 'Leica Users Group'
> Subject: RE: [Leica] LUG membership
>
>
> I completely agree with Jeffery's comment regarding the moribund 35mm 
> SLRs markert. Although it does mean that there are many bargains out 
> there on the Bay, for those committed enough to be countercyclical. I 
> must comment, though on two other things, Jeffery. Won't that new 
> subscriber be the third
> 1000th?? Up, down, up again ;-) and did you really say the number of pure
> Leica subscribers would be 50!!! Some sort of Freudian slip there ;-) 
> Cheers
> Hoppy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf 
> Of Jeffery Smith
> Sent: Monday, 23 October 2006 06:01
> To: 'Leica Users Group'
> Subject: RE: [Leica] LUG membership
>
> That means he is the 2nd 1000th subscriber. The other one happened 
> when
> the
> numbers were going *down* from 2000.
>
> I was just considering to myself what Cosina will do next, in light of 
> the digital influence you mention here. If you were to prohibit 
> digital talk on the LUG these days, I think the membership might drop 
> to 50. It is sad to see this happening to 35mm film cameras. If you 
> really want to read the handwriting on the wall, go to Adorama and try 
> to buy a decent 35mm SLR. You
> have exactly five choices: Nikon, Canon, Leica, Vivitar, and Phoenix (did 
> I
> say decent? Then we are down to Nikon, Canon, and Leica). No Pentax, no
> Olympus, no Minolta. I tried to buy a 35mm Pentax SLR body a while back. I
> finally had to settle for a used Pentax *ist from KEH.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Brian Reid
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 11:56 AM
> To: LUG@leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] LUG membership
>
>
> A few minutes ago, someone subscribed to the LUG, and thereby 
> (unbeknownst to him) became the 1000th subscriber. Before the 
> dominance of digital cameras, LUG membership peaked at nearly 2000, 
> but it had dropped to about 800 by midsummer 2006.
>
> I think this was due in part to a reduced interest in film cameras, 
> and in part to the growth of broadband (when more people have 
> always-on internet, there are more messages sent). I hope our 1000th 
> subscriber isn't driven away by the sheer number of messages, as many 
> newcomers are.
>
> I'm pretty sure that the announcement of the M8 is what's triggered 
> the recent growth spurt in membership. Since none of us owns an M8 
> yet, and very few of us have had a chance to touch one or use one, 
> most of the traffic about M8s has been rumor and speculation and 
> second-guessing of its engineering.
>
> As the M8 becomes available, there will be more and more messages 
> about digital photography here on the LUG. I dearly hope that it 
> doesn't drive away the film stalwarts. A good picture is a good 
> picture, regardless of whether you took it with film or a digital 
> sensor, with an M or an R. I've even heard supportable claims that you 
> can make good pictures with other brands of camera.
>
> Brian Reid
> LUG Saloon Keeper
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information