Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]there is only one version of the 28-90, there was a 28-70. but as you said, you can easily test them On 10/12/06, Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> wrote: > I think it is the later version, but I suppose I should shut up test > it and decide ;-) > > Cheers > On 12/10/2006, at 21:17, Seth Rosner wrote: > > > If it is the early 28-90, that is accurate, Alastair. That said, I > > owned a > > 28-90 and it produced quite acceptable images throughout the focal > > length reange. > > > > seth > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alastair Firkin" > > <firkin@ncable.net.au> > > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:49 AM > > Subject: [Leica] 28-90 vario > > > > > >> Someone told me the 28 -90 zoom was clearly inferior to the 35 to 70: > >> anyone have a comment? I was going to test one against the other > >> before > >> selling the 35 to 70. > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> > >> Alastair > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- ------------------------------------- regards, mehrdad