Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Spanish Clouds II
From: nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat Oct 7 14:29:57 2006
References: <002001c6ea4f$d2f9a590$2101a8c0@luispersonal>

Hi Luis,

In that case I am stumped...From my own experience with Rolleiflex and 
from looking at people's images, even if the lens may not be completely 
on par with modern Leica glass, the larger negative more than 
compensates for it. So if you scanned both on the same scanner, I simply 
don't understand. Perhaps there is more camera movement with the 
Rolleiflex shots? (I always found the Rolleiflex very awkward to hand-hold).

Regardless of the above, if your scanner is capable of producing 16-bit 
images, you should scan in 16-bit. It will give you much more 
flexibility when post-processing.

Saludos desde Holanda,
Nathan

Luis Ripoll wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> Your opinion is very interesting for me because I use only one Scanner for
> 35mm and 6x6 negatives, my Scanner is a flatbed EPSON 3170, I don't know
> what can I do to improve the Scann quality with Rolleiflex. Usually I scan
> at 1200 ppi for 35 mm and 900 for 6x6..., and 8 bit.
>
> Your opinion, and others will be welcome
>
> Saludos desde Barcelona
> Luis
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de
> Nathan Wajsman
> Enviado el: s?bado, 07 de octubre de 2006 9:15
> Para: Leica Users Group
> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Spanish Clouds II
>
> Hi Luis,
>
> I wonder how much of the difference is due to scanning--I suspect that 
> the Leica negatives are scanned on a proper film scanner, while the 
> Rollei ones are scanned on a flatbed. I find it difficult to believe 
> that Rolleiflex is inferior to Leica, given some of the magnificent 
> square images posted over the years by Daniel and others.
>
> Nathan
>
> Luis Ripoll wrote:
>   
>> Peter, you are right, the Leica pictures has a quality that they can
>>     
> compete
>   
>> with 6x6 Rolleiflex,
>>
>> Thanks for looking and commenting Peter
>>
>> Saludos desde Barcelona
>> Luis
>>
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre
>>     
> de
>   
>> Peter Dzwig
>> Enviado el: lunes, 02 de octubre de 2006 14:13
>> Para: Leica Users Group
>> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Spanish Clouds II
>>
>>
>>
>> Luis Ripoll wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Hi all,
>>>     
>>>       
>> ....
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> this one is maybe my favourite
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/060702-01w.jpg.html
>>>  
>>>     
>>>       
>> of the Rollei ones I agree. I am surprised by how much I prefer the Leica
>> shots.
>>
>> I find the clouds much more "interesting" in this one:
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/060801-11p.jpg.html
>>
>> It's a shame that there isn't more of the road in it.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>   

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS!

General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com

Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com

Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



Replies: Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Spanish Clouds II)
In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Spanish Clouds II)