Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That depends upon what he "saw" prior to shooting, versus what the objective visual reality was, doesn't it? On 9/29/06 2:02 PM, "Philippe Orlent" <philippe.orlent@pandora.be> wrote: > This is completely ridiculous. If the man saw the images that way > when he shot them, and it didn't turn out as he had envisioned > photographically, what is worng with this kind of manipulation? It > does not alter the truth, does it? > > Op 29-sep-06, om 12:50 heeft Tina Manley het volgende geschreven: > >> At 11:01 PM 9/28/2006, you wrote: >>> What was the real story there? >>> >>> I sure didn't get it looking at the photo. >>> >>> Ric >> >> http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp? >> vnu_content_id=1002914629 >> >> Patrick had had awards taken away before when he increased the >> contrast in some photos to make them more dramatic. This time he >> boosted the color to match what he said he remembered but didn't >> capture when he shot into the sun. None of the changes affected >> the meaning of the photos. They were all alterations that could >> have been made in the darkroom if he had been shooting film. >> >> Tina >> >> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA >> http://www.tinamanley.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information