Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was in a similar situation. I enjoy both. In 35mm (or its digital equivalent) I prefer analog when I want to deliberately slow down my pace and take more pensative shots (I don't like the darkroom and scanning, though: that's too slow), and use digital when I'm in a snapping away mood. Different results, without any personal preference. Must be because I don't have a definite signature. Or because I love to explore. But no bulky SLR's or DSLR's for me: of the about 40 camera's I bought and sold these last 2 years, only 1 was a SLR (a Nikon F2) that I kept for just one roll. So where does that leave me? With unobtrusive small cameras, manual or semi-automatic. Thus with rangefinders. Thus with Leica, because I want real quality and good interchangable lenses, and love (and feel) the fact that they're handmade. Maybe I should try an M8. I sure feel tempted. Sadly enough my wallet doesn't like to support that temptation. Yet... Philippe Op 27-sep-06, om 21:08 heeft Philip Forrest het volgende geschreven: > Lately I have fallen in love again with my old Nikon FM and a 50mm > f/1.8 > lens. Here begins my problem. I LOVE film however, I just can't > afford > shooting it as much as I would like. Soon perhaps, but that's of no > consequence. So I take my Canon EOS 10d out most places with me > and rarely > shoot ever. I try to make myself, but I don't know why the finger > doesn't > push the button. If I take my Leica with, I'll shoot several rolls > a day. > Same with the Nikon FM and my EOS RT. The digital DOES have a few > issues > that I don't like: warm up time, battery life, the crop factor and > a small > viewfinder. (I was spoiled by Nikon F3's and F4's a few years ago > and have > kicked myself every day for selling them.) So I'm wondering, is > there any > logical reason that I would consciously or subconsciously want to > shoot film > over digital? I'm hoping that a move up to an EOS 5d might help > this, but I > wouldn't want to invest $3k and find out that I still have this > digital > "funk" and continue to shoot film. I'm not saying that one is > better than > the other. I'm "soul searching" for a reason of why I want to take a > photograph with a film camera and not a digital. Because I believe > that in > the end it's all about the image itself & not the tools used to > make it. > > Your sage wisdom is appreciated. > > Philip > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >