Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sat Sep 23 13:26:03 2006
References: <000301c6df4d$9dfc20a0$35510b44@newukolbqveo9i>

5 secs? That's ridiculous! My Ricoh GRD needs only 20... ;-)



Op 23-sep-06, om 22:19 heeft Jeffery Smith het volgende geschreven:

> I don't think so. I've been getting away from raw for street stuff  
> simply
> because it takes so long to read to the card. A lot happens in the  
> 5 seconds
> or so between shots.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of  
> Eric
> Korenman
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:13 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
>
>
> the samung looks great.
> Can it write RAW?
>
> eric
>
>
>
> On 9/23/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> I've been enticed by:
>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091408leicadlux3.asp
>> and
>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0607/06070302samsungnv10.asp
>>
>> Finding a single-focal-length small digital is a daunting task.
>>
>> Jeffery Smith
>> New Orleans, LA
>> http://www.400tx.com
>> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>> Eric Korenman
>> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 1:38 PM
>> To: LUG
>> Subject: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
>>
>>
>> Yeah I'd love to have an M8. blah ditty blah.
>>
>> But what I am really looking for is the best digital replacement for
>> my pocket ultra sharp film cameras. IE - what digital cameras compete
>> well to replace the Contax T (or T3, or Rollei 35 for that matter)
>>
>> I have strongly considered the Ricoh GRD. While the GR1v I owned  
>> was a
>> stunner, 28mm FOV is a bit too wide for my taste.
>>
>> Dream camera (at this nanosecond) would be somthing like the GRD with
>> a 40mm lens and faster RAW write time. Also considering the LX2 but I
>> haven't gotten my hands on one yet. A digital Leica CM would fit the
>> bill nicely.
>>
>> cameras I should consider?
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)