Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2006-09-15-16:42:39 Mark Rabiner: > But its bumming me out I 'm not able to rate my shots with stars like with > Bridge. This has become a vital part of my "workflo". Yeah, me too. What meanings have people assigned to various numbers of stars upon thars? I use: * I'd probably throw this out if I weren't such a packrat ** This has something to recommend it, but doesn't quite make the cut -- maybe for reasons intrinsic to this picture, maybe because there are better ones of the same subject in this batch *** This makes the cut for this project **** This is better than that -- it's among the best from this project, and its interest probably transcends this project ***** This is one of my best pictures, and I definitely need not to miss it when I'm putting together my book or something What I'd like, though, is two separate (orthogonal, we science geeks like to say) rating scales: one for intrinsic technical/aesthetic goodness of the photo as a photo, and one having to do with the photo's value as a documentation of whatever's being documented -- if working for clients, this'd be an attempt to capture some notion of *their* silly point of view. On the Mac, in addition to the stars, you can assign funny colors -- but I'm not diggin' it.