Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Sep 10 14:47:27 2006
References: <20060910000305.11915.qmail@web56606.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <IPEJJPIMDEGNKCCLEDOHCEOGGOAA.joelct@singnet.com.sg> <b7fa7450609100922h639a6d7du72b22bbf33f20f3d@mail.gmail.com>

Kevin Cameras in LA has several in good to pristine condition.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 9/10/06, Chan Yong Wei <yongwei.chan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What I'm really lusting after is the Canon 50/1.5 Sonnar.
>
> YW
>
> On 9/10/06, Joseph Low <joelct@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> >              Bill
> >
> >              Bought mine from Kevin Cameras in LA - an excellent piece -
> > then found the
> >              original lens hood on ebay
> >
> >              The rig sits on my Canon P
> >
> >              Cheers / Joseph
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org
> > [mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of
> Bill
> > Smith
> > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 8:03 AM
> > To: Leica Users Group
> > Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
> >
> > Joseph:
> >
> >   The 35/ 1.5 has good ratings but pricey. I wish you guys had listed
> the
> > 25/ 3.5 to make me feel better--I just bought one!!!
> >
> >   Thanks for all the fine intell.
> >
> >   Bill
> >
> > Joseph Low <joelct@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> >   Ken
> >
> > Check out the Canon 35/1.5 LTM as well
> >
> > Joseph / Singapore
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org
> > [mailto:lug-bounces+joelct=singnet.com.sg@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of
> > Kenneth Frazier
> > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 2:34 AM
> > To: Leica Users Group
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
> >
> >
> > On Sep 9, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Mark Langer wrote:
> >
> > > 'd rate the 35/2, the 100/3.5 and the 100/2 as great lenses.
> >
> > Thanks, Mark, and others, for all the good input. Sounds like I ned
> > to look more closely at the Canons.
> >
> > Ken
> > -----------------------------------
> > The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
> > Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
> > ----------------------------------
> > Current Leica Photography (PESO):
> > http://gallery2.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/
> >
> > Current Medium Format Photos:
> > http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn
> >
> > Current Leica Photography (in move to new gallery)
> > http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
> > countries) for 2?/min or less.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
Message from joelct at singnet.com.sg (Joseph Low) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
Message from yongwei.chan at gmail.com (Chan Yong Wei) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)