Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'd rate the 35/2, the 100/3.5 and the 100/2 as great lenses. I also have a particular fondness for the inexpensive 100/4 as a portrait lens. I find the signature on this to be similar to the early 90/4 Elmar, but with a bit more reach. Best of the bunch though is the 100/3.5, which is incredibly light and a superb performer by any standard. It is always in my camera bag, no matter what combo of lenses I choose to trot around with. Mark On 9/9/06, Eduardo Albesi <lists@sololeicas.com> wrote: > > Ken, try a Canon 35/2. It's an incredible performer. You can read the > Dante Stella page about Canon LTM lenses for plenty of info and > reviews. Other great lenses are the 100/3.5 and the 135/3.5 > > Best > > Ed > > El 09/09/2006, a las 12:04, Kenneth Frazier escribi?: > > > > > On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: > > > >> The entire Canon line of LTM lenses is very good with performance > >> indistinguishable from Leica lenses for the same camera. > > > > thanks, Larry. Several folk have recommended this, and I'm looking > > at the prices. > > > > Ken > > ----------------------------------- > > The Rev. Kenneth Frazier > > Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ > > ---------------------------------- > > Current Leica Photography (PESO): > > http://gallery2.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/ > > > > Current Medium Format Photos: > > http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn > > > > Current Leica Photography (in move to new gallery) > > http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >