Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: DMR for nature work
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Mon Sep 4 08:35:34 2006
References: <44FA25D8.3030006@adrenaline.com> <004501c6cefe$b6976cf0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <44FA3B99.6020105@adrenaline.com> <009201c6cf18$0386f9e0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <667e9af89b81d2d50135b9b26d715c80@earthlink.net> <7922F8A9-539B-4606-82E6-D8746DBBBC83@ncable.net.au> <5f48586fbd8d3b5198bbd03150f67b26@earthlink.net> <82c9dd70609040755y76bb6ades562e2a18344831d3@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.0.20060904081510.01bbdb90@telus.net>

not sure - I shoot pretty standardily. Just looked up 'chimping' on
wikipedia.
I 'chimp' occasionally to check focus and exposure. But not as much as I
have seen other photogs do.

I use Kensignton 2gb cards.

Eric

On 9/4/06, David Young <telyt@telus.net> wrote:
>
> At 04/09/2006, you wrote:
>
> >Doug - I get about 400-500 raw images per battery.
> >
> >Eric
> >
> >
> >On 9/4/06, Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>The biggest problem as I see it is battery life.  I find that the
> >>battery lasts for about 2 Gb of photos (RAW files), less with chimping,
> >>so a second battery and a means of charging are essential.  For
> >>car-camping it's not a problem; for backpacking I'd look in to a solar
> >>charger or a different camera.
> >>
> >>Doug Herr
>
>
> How do you do this, Eric?  Like Doug, I get about 100 - 130 shots per
> battery/charge - with moderate "chimping" & deleting.  I do, however,
> turn off the LCD's "review" feature, which is both annoying and a
> waste of  battery power.  I carry two 2 gig cards, and 2 batteries,
> which is normally enough for me, for a day.
> ---
>
> David Young,
> Logan Lake, CANADA
>
> Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
> Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) (DMR for nature work (was: Re: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)))
Message from telyt at telus.net (David Young) ([Leica] Re: DMR for nature work)