Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x
From: allen.graves at charter.net (Allen Graves)
Date: Sun Aug 27 19:07:42 2006
References: <082620061403.27034.44F054A10006C8340000699A219791299503010CD2079C080C03BF 970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com> <008e01c6c921$78d24df0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <9b678e0608261827y731aaacfv77b6b9d8a76ad326@mail.gmail.com> <003d01c6c981$a3a6ce60$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <9b678e0608261904q32333f00h7ed47c03b83370a5@mail.gmail.com> <C1A279E9-89C2-495D-A1F7-0DFAADBD1DCC@earthlink.net> <22c93b290608262116r2682af32rdfdd95cecd11f51b@mail.gmail.com> <9b5af6d44232eea25a2f2feab1e865c7@earthlink.net> <44F19D32.1010907@adrenaline.com>

The magnifier with the 28 f2.0 works pretty well on the D200, but 
that is a very easy lens to focus. I've also had good results with 
the 85 f1.4 and the magnifier, but also cheating and using the focus 
confirmation with it.  I'm waiting for my Katz Eye screen, so I can't 
comment on it.

Allen

>Douglas Herr wrote:
>
>Funny how the standards for SLR viewfinders have deteriorated so 
>much that the D200 or 5D is considered 'decent'.
>
>---------
>Sad to say, but that's *right on the money*. The degree of compromise
>accepted by many/most DSLR buyers/users is pretty astounding -
>particularly when one considers the high cost of the camera bodies.
>
>I have this stupid "heuristic" test - standing 1-2 meters away from a
>person, can I be *dead sure* (therefore, visual confirmation) whether or
>not I'm focusing on the near eye or the far eye of the subject. My
>M6TTL's and FM3a pass the test with little difficulty.
>
>I have a close buddy who shoots mostly Mamiya 7 and a Linhof 4x5
>monorail. But he's also a new user of the Nikon D70, and he responded
>"Why does it matter?" This coming from a guy who typically stares through
>a high mag loupe at the ground glass and uses camera movements to refine
>focus!!!
>
>Clearly to me, when it comes to DSLR's, standards are greatly relaxed.
>
>At least in the Nikon world, highest mag (if not full coverage) comes
>from the FM/FE series of cameras - available used in good condition
>from KEH for anywhere from around $250 on up. Compare those
>VF's to the ones in all but the most precious DSLR's. ($$$$)
>
>As I've said before, the D200 fits in my budget; the VF is a marked
>improvement over the D70; and it's a spiffy camera.
>
>But now I'm looking into the Katz focusing screen and the eyepiece
>magnifier to to get something that will properly focus my 28/2.8 AIS.
>I'm treating it as an experiment, so as to not to be too disappointed.
>I've read highly conflicting views on both the focusing screen and the
>magnifier.
>
>We'll see.
>
>Scott
>
>--
>Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
>Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
>(Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
In reply to: Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Photos of M8 now D2x)