Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Walker Evans--digital reproductions
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Fri Aug 25 08:32:17 2006
References: <9b678e0608250759wd821905n1c76684731460220@mail.gmail.com> <000801c6c858$fae47030$6601a8c0@asus930>

Hoppy,
No, just halfway to exhaustion and only two brain cells firing today.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 8/25/06, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
> Don , was "Cistine Chapel" some kind of Freudian slip regarding the worth
> of
> the comments by the reviewer? (half-way to cistern)
> My .02 with spell check
> Hoppy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Don Dory
> Sent: Saturday, 26 August 2006 00:59
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Walker Evans--digital reproductions
>
> Lee,
> The reviewer is a pretentious twerp IMHO.  In the first paragraphs he
> admits
> that Walker Evans wasn't especially interested in the printing of the
> images.  So, if a later person comes along and finds another story in the
> images then so what? (Assuming the pedigree of the images is clearly
> stated)  What I got out of the reviewer was angst that the actual image
> could be gorgeous even though the content frequently was depressing.
>
> The truth of photography is that it is the peoples medium and the folks do
> what they will with the images.  As a photographer, the only way to
> control
> your images is to destroy the originals when you are done with them.
> Otherwise, someone else may come along and re interpret what you did or
> didn't do.
>
> If you have a problem with loss of control then take up painting, but even
> there someone may come along a few hundred years later and "restore" the
> painting ala the Cistine Chapel.
>
> 0.02
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
> On 8/25/06, Lee England <Engl6914@cableone.net> wrote:
> >
> > An interesting article I ran into in this morning's New York Times on an
> > exhibit of digital reproductions of Walker Evan's prints and the
> problems
> > associated with their interpretation.
> >
> > > http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/25/arts/design/25evan.html
> >
> > Lee England
> > Natchez, Mississippi
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Walker Evans--digital reproductions)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Walker Evans--digital reproductions)