Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You know, guys, the 50mm f1.2 Zuiko was sharper than the 55mm, had better coatings, flatter field, and still had great out of focus rendition. Just to confuse things a little more. Will von Dauster On Aug 24, 2006, at 8:12 PM, B. D. Colen wrote: > True enough...but in this case, Sonny, show me the difference - > other than > the size, the weight, and the cost...This is a lens that came with > a body I > bought in Ebay about a decade ago - I've got no emotional - or > financial - > investment in it, and haven't ever bothered with it. > > > On 8/24/06 9:31 PM, "SonC@aol.com" <SonC@aol.com> wrote: > >> >> >> In a message dated 8/24/2006 8:29:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time, >> don.dory@gmail.com writes: >> >>> For the buy-it-now price north of $5K - >>> Or you can buy an Olympilux 55 1.2 for the buy-it-now price >>> of....$355... >> >> >> >> yeah, and you can buy a bottle of wine for under $5 or over $5000. >> They both >> do the same thing, sorta. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> Sonny >> http://www.sonc.com >> Natchitoches, Louisiana >> Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane >> ?galit?, libert?, crawfish >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information