Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That's what I thought...Unless they were very, very precocious.. ;-) On 8/7/06 1:53 PM, "Craig Semetko" <csemetko@earthlink.net> wrote: > Yes, B.D., the Turnleys are twins, so the photographer couldn't have > been Peter either. > > Craig > > On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:41 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:27:44 -0400 >> From: "B. D. Colen" <bd@bdcolenphoto.com> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Another Altered Photo >> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >> Message-ID: <C0FCF050.13784%bd@bdcolenphoto.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" >> >> Wait - Aren't David and Peter twins? >> >> >> On 8/7/06 1:25 PM, "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote: >> >>> I was trying to remember who the fellow was? His brother? >>> >>> Walt >>> >>> Craig Semetko wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Walt, >>>> >>>> I may be wrong, but I don't think David Turnley missed the shot--he >>>> was 16 in 1972 when the shot was taken... >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Craig >>>> >>>> NO ARCHIVE >>>> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information