[Leica] Another Altered Photo

[walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)]

That's your side of the story


B. D. Colen wrote:

>Wait - Aren't David and Peter twins?
>
>
>On 8/7/06 1:25 PM, "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I was trying to remember who the fellow was? His brother?
>>
>>Walt
>>
>>Craig Semetko wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hey Walt,
>>>
>>>I may be wrong, but I don't think David Turnley missed the shot--he
>>>was 16 in 1972 when the shot was taken...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>
>>>Craig
>>>
>>>NO ARCHIVE
>>>
>>>On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:05 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>From: Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com>
>>>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Another Altered Photo
>>>>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>>Message-ID: <44D7587C.5040607@waltjohnson.com>
>>>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>>>
>>>>I'm sure those in the unaltered photo were much happier being bombed in
>>>>low contrast. As I mentioned before, look at Christopher Anderson's work
>>>>http://www.magnumphotos.com/c/ on the Magnum site. Anderson, a Canadian,
>>>>should be relatively objective. His work seems to be straightforward and
>>>>for him, a very risky business. Wonder what rationale Limbaugh would use
>>>>prove Anderson's images fake? Perhaps he could call on Westmoreland's PR
>>>>expert who stated Nick Ut faked it with his napalm shot. I've heard
>>>>tales David Turnley missed the shot loading an M3 but that Ut was also
>>>>using a Leica?
>>>>
>>>>Walt
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>  
>