Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George does, I think, have it pegged - but there's another way to look at it, and that is my patriot is your terrorist. And, of course, vice versa. On 8/2/06 11:58 AM, "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote: > Hmm, That's veeerry interesting. It does sound as if George Washington > might have qualified as a terrorist while Robert E. Lee was a patriot. > I've /*always*/ considered General Lee to be a hero but then what else > could you expect from a cracker like me. ;-) > > Walt > > > > Lottermoser George wrote: > >> From what I can piece together - it seems that the "terrorists" will >> remain labeled as such, no matter how well they're equipped. To have >> your label move from "terrorist" to "patriotic hero" you have to be >> sworn to loyalty to a state government (or hired by same government). >> Anyone who fights in opposition to state governments is liable to be >> labeled "terrorist." I think I go that right? : ^ ) >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george@imagist.com >> >> >> >> On Aug 2, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Walt Johnson wrote: >> >>> Would they still be considered terrorists then? If they had the same >>> resources as their Israeli counterparts? That is a question beyond >>> the scope of my world view. Perhaps the editorial board at the NYTs >>> could bat it around a bit some morning over coffee and croissants?. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information