Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] re: charlotte observer fires dude for changing the sky
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Tue Aug 1 21:53:41 2006
References: <493.68fe2c7.3201385c@aol.com> <C0F5615A.133E5%bd@bdcolenphoto.com>

B.D.
No, standards are the life blood of any organisation.  However, after seeing
the altered photo, WTF!  It is a highly stylised silhouete or a very nice
graphic image.  What difference would it make to the story if the
firefighter was working on a polluted day or a nice sunny day at the beach.
We are not talking about firefighters in the brush in California surrounded
by smoke or a glorious sunny day or changing a protest march in the rain
into a sunny walk in the park.

The paper wanted him gone so they dusted off the rule book and looked around
for something.  For an image like that I suspect that the editor asked for a
dramatic image to lead the readers into the section.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 8/1/06, B. D. Colen <bd@bdcolenphoto.com> wrote:
>
> So let's all just say to hell with all standards and be done with it,
> right?
> ;-)
>
>
> On 8/1/06 7:06 PM, "Bartphotog@aol.com" <Bartphotog@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > In a message dated 7/31/06 6:54:26 PM, don.dory@gmail.com writes:
> >
> > << I am far more concerned with straight photography lying than changing
> the
> >
> > color of the sky.  We all know that access and viewpoint can make a lot
> of
> >
> > difference in the story you tell if the editors will let you tell the
> story
> >
> > you want.  Reference the NYTimes stories coming out of the Soviet Union
> in
> >
> > the 20's and 30's saying all was well in the Ukraine when hundreds of
> >
> > thousands were starving to death. >>
> >
> > You're quite right, of course.  Photography has always been cabable of
> being
> > used to twist the truth;  it's just a bit easier now.   And I absolutely
> agree
> > that changing the sky color for visual impact - even assuming he was
> > untruthful about just trying to restore the true color - is much less of
> a
> > threat to
> > journalistic integrity than stuff, photos and otherwise, that gets
> printed
> > every day in the mainstream media.
> >
> > Bart
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from Bartphotog at aol.com (Bartphotog@aol.com) ([Leica] re: charlotte observer fires dude for changing the sky)
Message from bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] re: charlotte observer fires dude for changing the sky)