[Leica] re: charlotte observer fires dude for changing the sky

[ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)]

Yep, that's it.

This seems SO minor, as do the earlier "violations." (seen here:  
http://zonezero.com/editorial/octubre03/october.html)

This must self-aggrandizement by the editors, or they just wanted his  
tail gone.

I fail to see what the lie here is, or in what way anyone was misled.  
Is a raw file really a better guide to reality than what the witness  
saw? I don't know about you guys, but when lighting gets unaverage, I  
see processors returning results that don't look like the reality  
seen by human eye. Autoscan returns perfect results every time, right?

Ric



On Aug 1, 2006, at 9:45 PM, jon.stanton@comcast.net wrote:

> Is this the link?
>
> http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp? 
> vnu_content_id=1002914629
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information