Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:DSLR advice....Leica glass on 20D
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com)
Date: Tue Aug 1 07:22:06 2006

Unfortunately comparing the 30D to the D50 Nikon is like comparing King Kong 
to a Chimpanzee.  They are not in the same class at all.  Don't know 
anything about the Olympus and Sony models, but suspect it is the same 
problem.  Also the Olympus is a smaller sensor to begin with, so there is 
that problem also.

When compared to the Nikon D200, the 30D has not done very well at all, 
except in the high iso area, but even there it was not that much better.  
The price point of the Canon is better, by about $300, but the Nikon is a 
better made and operator friendly box, and easy to use features.
Gene


-------------- Original message from Nick Roberts 
<nickbroberts@yahoo.co.uk>: -------------- 


> Well the UK's Amateur Photographer magazine has just tested the EOS 30D, 
> Nikon 
> D70s, Sony Alpha 100 (with the same chip as the new Nikon, surely?) and 
> the 
> Olympus E500. The clear winner on actual resolution is - the Canon. And if 
> a 
> similar combo of Canon body, Nikon lenses is good enough for Tim Burton to 
> shoot 
> a movie, might it not be good enough for Ken? ;) 
> 
> Nick 
> 
> ----- Original Message ---- 
> From: Jayanand Govindaraj 
> To: Leica Users Group 
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 5:34:17 PM 
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:DSLR advice....Leica glass on 20D 
> 
> Ken, 
> It seems to me, as you already have quite a few Nikon lenses, that you 
> need the new 10 MP DSLR that Nikon is announcing in 10 days or so (the 
> betting is under US$ 1000). The D200 works with all Nikon lenses, so 
> that might be what you want otherwise....With all Nikon lenses, why 
> should you buy Canon? Or am I missing something here? 
> Cheers 
> Jayanand 
> 
> 
> Kenneth Frazier wrote: 
> 
> > 
> > On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:57 AM, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: 
> > 
> >> You might as well sell off gear that won't see the light of day. I 
> >> think the window to recoup anything from analogue gear is getting 
> >> narrower and narrower. The time might as well be now (Saying this as 
> >> I sit on 5 leica bodies which won't see commercial use anytime soon, 
> >> or in my lifetime). 
> > 
> > 
> > I have! :-) And, from what I'm seeing, I think you're right about 
> > the window narrowing. I'm keeping the film gear I will use, 
> > regularly, and have disposed of most of what I won't use. 
> > 
> > Back to specifics: In your opinion, which DSLR bodies "should" I be 
> > looking at seriously? 
> > 
> > The 20D is attractive to me, right now, because of it's proven 
> > record, price, the features I need, and because I can use a variety 
> > of non-Canon lenses, some of which I have. 
> > 
> > Ken 
> > ----------------------------------- 
> > The Rev. Kenneth Frazier 
> > Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ 
> > ---------------------------------- 
> > Current Leica Photography (PESO): 
> > http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r 
> > 
> > Current Medium Format Photos: 
> > http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Leica Users Group. 
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information