Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Arche, Dante Stella was referring to a 35/1.8 lens and yours is a 50/1.8. These are two totally different lenses. Could you please clarify? Joe -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jcyleung8=shaw.ca@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jcyleung8=shaw.ca@leica-users.org]On Behalf Of H. Ball Arche Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:05 AM To: lug@leica-users.org Subject: [Leica] FS: Canon LTM 1.8/50 Last chance before I put it up for auction. This is the 2nd version of this great lens, not the chrome Serenar. On his site, Dante Stella said he couldn't see a difference between this lens and the 1st rigid Summicron. http://www.dantestella.com/technical/canoleic.html This lens is in gorgeous condition (Jpegs if you're interested), comes with a Canon uva filter, a very nice 3rd party hood, and front & rear caps. $275. I'd much rather see this lens go to one of you guys than some shmo, and I need to pay for the M6 TTL 0.58 I just bought. Arche __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information