Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 4:14 PM -0400 7/12/06, Tina Manley wrote: >At 11:53 AM 7/12/2006, you wrote: > The one stop of extra performance didn't make sense for the money and > weight >> * Henning J. Wulff > >It does if you need the extra stop ;-) The 85/1.2 and 24/1.4 are my >two favorite Canon lenses. > >TIna Certainly, Tina. I have the 24/1.4 as well, and I use it a lot, but its performance is acceptable rather than good. The 35/1.4 is a whole different thing, and that lens is really great. As a lot of the stuff I shoot holds still, I find that something like the 24-105 with IS can actually allow me to get a shot at significantly lower light levels than a f/1.4 or so lens without IS. As I wrote to someone else just now, these statements on relative quality, worth, etc are 'objective' only in my universe, where I'm concerned with what I shoot and the results I like. Probably a disclaimer that can be attached to most 'tests' on the 'net to one degree or other. :-) -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com