Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the link. It was worth a browse. If you are shooting Canon digital the choice would be the 85 1.2 as it is less expensive, offers incredible options at 1.2 and 3200 ISO while being very good indeed optically. For those of us using film, the real choice would be the 85 Sonnar or the 75 Summicron. Final decision would be based on size, feel, and whether you need a little more reach. Amazing that in less than a decade the phenomenal performance of the 90 APO would be challenged. Good times indeed for photographers. Don don.dory@gmail.com On 7/12/06, G Hopkinson <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > Folks, Herr Putts has a new entry with some comparisons Summicron -Sonnar- > Canon > > On film and digital. > > Worth a browse I think > > http://www.imx.nl/photosite/zeiss/test85/t004.html > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >