Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: OT: Re: [Leica] Twin Towers
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Fri Jun 23 16:20:52 2006
References: <700d497026de.7026de700d49@shaw.ca> <449BE42A.4070601@waltjohnson.com> <4cfa589b0606230830o32a067d1p5d7c7714861de4a7@mail.gmail.com> <449C495F.6060805@adrenaline.com>

Citing the web-of-a-million-lies as a source of reliable information
indicates a certain degree of credulity regarding such events as 9/11
that's disturbing. There are lots of web sites about the moon landing
being faked, also.

Garbage in - Garbage out and it's never more true than almost anything
you can find on the web where anyone can write anything and sound
authoritative.

Adam

On 6/23/06, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> When I commented, I really didn't mean to step into a
> battle.
>
> But the point of my post was just to say that anyone
> can go read oodles of info online, the official 9/11
> report, lots and lots of archived US and foreign press
> stories - and then make one's own judgements for
> ONESELF. Hence my "grain of salt" comment, etc.
>
> An emotional subject for many? Yes. A need to
> start an emotional debate here on the LUG? No.
>
> Scott
>
> Adam Bridge wrote:
>
> > Sigh.
> >
> > On 6/23/06, Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Walt Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hell, I'm not into conspiracy but  far as the company line on why they
> >> > collapsed, bullshit. At least one of the a/c spent the majority of
> >> > it's fuel load out the other side of the tower. To attribute the
> >> > simultaneous collapse to airspeed and fuel load seems quite gullible.
> >> >
> >> > I watched the Challenger explode from my front yard, having left KSC
> >> > an hour or so earlier. Of course the initial shock of a disaster such
> >> > as that carries it's own emotional bagage but eventually truth rears
> >> > its ugly head. Watching the shuttle explode on tape many times raised
> >> > some questions in my mind. It did not appear to be the type of
> >> > explosion that would insure all sboard woould perish instantly. The
> >> > offical KSC line claimed instant death to all and they spent months
> >> > "searching" for the wreckage before it was recovered. Now, even a
> >> > Cesna 172 carries an ELT so who would believe it took that long to
> >> > recover the crew compartment?
> >> >
> >> > GREG LORENZO wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Scott McLoughlin writes:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>Walt Johnson wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>I was amazed at how fast they both came down. Plane crash or no,
> >> there
> >> >>>>is something not quite kosher about the twin and simultaneous
> >> collapse.
> >> >>>>Walt
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>If you google, you will find a number of Web resources on how
> >> >>>odd it was that the towers came down so quickly. One report
> >> >>>was from some reputable group of physicists or something. In
> >> >>>any case, you'll find it very sober reading/take it with a grain
> >> >>>of salt/etc. etc.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>If they were a 'reputable group of physicists' they would be
> >> posting the simple fact that these buildings were designed to
> >> withstand an impact from a Boeing 707 coming into New York to land
> >> with a minimal fuel load at an airspeed of approximately 180 mph. NOT
> >> a Boeing 767 almost fully loaded with 90,000 litres of jet fuel at an
> >> airspeed in excess of 500 mph. In effect both buildings were doomed
> >> from the instant of impact on. The amount of time to full structural
> >> failure probably determinable mathmatically.
> >> >>
> >> >>The internet is choc o' bloc with all kinds of conspiracy and other
> >> nuts who have nothing better to do with their time then to spin such
> >> nonsence.
> >> >>
> >> >>Regards,
> >> >>
> >> >>Greg
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>_______________________________________________
> >> >>Leica Users Group.
> >> >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> --
> Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
> Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
> (Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (OT: Re: [Leica] Twin Towers)
Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) (OT: Re: [Leica] Twin Towers)
In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) (OT: Re: [Leica] Twin Towers)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) (OT: Re: [Leica] Twin Towers)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) (OT: Re: [Leica] Twin Towers)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) (OT: Re: [Leica] Twin Towers)