Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 18, 2006, at 4:19 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > Phil Swango writes: > >> BD, or anyone else: I seem to be missing the point of the 4/3concept. >> I can get several makes of DSLRs in the 6-8 mp range (APS-size >> sensor) for >> $600-800. Most will take some lenses I already have. Since the >> better 4/3 >> cameras cost that much or more, what's the advantage? > >> Not trolling -- I'm actually trying to learn something. >> It's a marketing decision rather than a technical decision. With Olympus, Kodak, Leica, and Panasonic onboard, the 4/3 standard may have some chance of succeeding in the marketplace. There is enough critical mass to induce third party suppliers to produce components and lenses. Sort of like the 42 mm standard. You can now advertize that your Olympus and/or Panasonic cameras can use Leica lenses. I doubt that any Leicaphiles would be induced to buy if it were the other way around. Larry Z