Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Full frame problems
From: lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin)
Date: Fri Jun 16 08:41:51 2006
References: <200606160301.k5G31HGt020575@server1.waverley.reid.org>

The grazing angle of a 50 mm lens (back focus about 30 mm) is about 33 
degrees at the corners of the image frame. The Kodak KAI-110000 sensor, 
the one that Leica will probably use, requires an angle no greater than 
15 degrees. A strong planoconcave correction plate in contact with the 
full sized sensor might be the least expensive but it would require 
considerable design work and would not work optimally with all lenses. 
The plate would have to deflect light to the vertical by 18 to 20 
degrees at the corners decreasing to zero degrees at the center. For 
lenses shorter than 50 mm, the corner deflection angle would have to be 
greater, longer lenses would require less deflection. A fixed 
correction plate would work best for only one focal length. One 
suggestion was to supply alternate plates for specific lens ranges, 
another was to use a single plate and correct for light fall off by 
software, the frame actuator or lens coding triggering the right 
software mode. An alternative suggestion to the planoconcave correction 
plate is a fresnel lens with groove artifacts removed by software. The 
suggestion proposed in a Leica press release was to use individual 
micro lenses over each of the image wells in the sensor, most probably 
molded into a single pastic overlay. This is a modification of the 
fresnel lens method.

Which approach will Leica use? I'm taking bets now.

Larry Z

Replies: Reply from chandos at cox.net (Chandos Michael Brown) ([Leica] FS: 50 'cron, 50DR, and Pentax Digital Spotmeter.)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re: Full frame problems)