Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital Leica M
From: bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Thu Jun 15 06:24:21 2006
References: <p06230909c0b5ece893aa@[10.0.1.3]> <2B102DE3F7C92A4798E4F184BB5EB50B1EA1F9@gsmbnmp17es.firmwide.corp.gs.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20060614203253.02f2ee90@screengang.com> <C7D1D51A-EC65-439D-8B15-C8409D967CD8@earthlink.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20060615141805.02abca20@screengang.com> <3547-SnapperMsg4EA12C31C0B701EF@[70.194.162.132]> <F36EA5AE-FD9B-41BF-9849-2F583D0EE66D@earthlink.net>

I, too, am waiting for that Sigma. I just wish it was a 25 or 26, rather 
than a 30.


...... Original Message .......
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:07:37 -0600 Will von Dauster 
<vondauster@earthlink.net> wrote:
>True, BD, though the Olympus long primes and he slower, shorter macro  
>did not occur to me as I'm kind of hoping for something in the range  
>of a 25mm f1.4 (50mm 1.4 equiv). The Sigma, which like Didier I  
>haven't seen yet, may be close if its wide open response is up to  
>snuff. I have little doubt that a Leica/Panasonic or Oly version  
>would perform up to par with my old M glass..
>
>Especially if, as you mention below, the superb higher-end Olympus  
>zoom lens performance is any guide. The 11-22 is indeed as good as  
>any wide angle prime I've ever used. (Haven't tried the 35-100 yet.)
>
>Will
>
>On Jun 15, 2006, at 6:24 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:
>
>> There are also several Olympus primes, including a 150 f 2 (300 f 2 in
>> 35mm-speak) that is scary good. And frankly, a number of the zooms,
>> including the 35-100 f2 (70-200) and 11-22 are a match for most  
>> primes.
>>
>>
>> ...... Original Message .......
>> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:19:40 +0200 Didier Ludwig
>> <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote:
>>> Will
>>> There's another prime, the Sigma 1.4/30 for 4/3, announced since  
>>> the PMA
>> in march, but not available yet, afaik
>>> Didier
>>>
>>>>> ...Rumours talk about Leica prime lenses for the 4/3 standard, too.
>>>>> Didier.
>>>>
>>>> Now I'm interested.
>>>> The only Olympus "prime" lens I have for he 4/3rds system is the  
>>>> 50mm
>>>> f2 Macro I just picked up last weekend. WOW. I wish Oly made more
>>>> primes, but I'll settle for a few Leica lenses...
>>>> :-)
>>>> Will von Dauster
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> ___
>> Sent from handheld device. Please forgive any typos or spelling  
>> errors.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
___
Sent from handheld device. Please forgive any typos or spelling errors.

Replies: Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)
In reply to: Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)
Message from michael.francis at gs.com (Francis, Michael) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)
Message from vondauster at earthlink.net (Will von Dauster) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)
Message from vondauster at earthlink.net (Will von Dauster) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)