Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There is another factor for consideration - some of us don't have enough time in the day to look at everyone's portfolio. Also meant as no disrespect Doug, but I am not a big fan of wildlife photography. Despite intellectually knowing how tough it is to get the perfect shot on a moving target, emotionally I don't really have much attachment to wildlife photography. To each his own poison and pleasure. ernie At 09:25 AM 6/7/2006, you wrote: >Doug - The quality of your work is so consistently high that it's >hard to find things to say. > >I wonder, too, if we really understand how difficult your work is to do. > >Maybe if you included a subtitle along the lines of: "Shot # 241 >out of 243 that afternoon after waiting a couple of hours in a >chilly drizzle with my feet freezing and my back aching for the damn >bird to settle down and the sun to come out and finally get low >enough to produce the modelling I was after," you'd get more reaction. ;-) > >I have the same problem with Graham and a whole bunch of others on >the list. The quality of the postings is just so consistently high >that it's hard to respond interestingly. > >(Unless Graham posts something with a narrow boat in it, then he >knows he'll get a response, of course. ;-) ) > >Keep 'em coming. I enjoy the looking. > >Dick > > > > >>At 09:27 PM 6/6/2006, SonC@aol.com wrote: >> >>>On Jun 6, 2006, at 9:49 PM, Douglas Herr wrote: >>> >>>> ...The Cooper's Hawk photo I posted a couple of days ago (with ZERO >>>> response from the LUG) ... >>> >>>I've posted hundreds with the same result. It is not about response. >>>Post >>>because you think it is good enough to be seen. They are looking. >>>They / we / >>>I are / am too busy to respond to all posts, but we look. >> >>I think the difference is that with pros like you (Sonny), Doug, >>Tina, BD etc., it's more like "Wow, another great >>(flowers/birds/people/...)" What's there to say :-)? >> >> >>// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, >>please use richard at imagecraft.com) >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information