Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital Leica M
From: bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Wed Jun 7 05:17:51 2006
References: <4a0.24cee57.31b81637@aol.com>

And, Sonny, they provided a list of lenses that can be converted - look at 
p. 2 of the announcement - and it is pitifully slim. ;-)


 ..... Original Message .......
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 07:44:55 EDT SonC@aol.com wrote:
> 
> 
>In a message dated 6/7/2006 5:51:40 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
>bdcolen@comcast.net writes:
>
>they have simply implied, with this latest announcement, that only  those
>lenses that have been "converted" will produce results that don't  need 
>major
>surgery in Photoshop. ;-)
>----------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I don't see how "optimize the image" implies that non-coded lenses  will 
>cause you to need major surgery in Photoshop for every  image.     
>
>
>Regards,  
>Sonny
>http://www.sonc.com
>Natchitoches, Louisiana
>Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
>?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
___
Sent from handheld device. Please forgive any typos or spelling errors.


In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] Digital Leica M)