Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/06/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No, but for the same print size (greater magnification) it is effectively a 180 and the rangefinder isn't up to the job, especially if it's a .68 mag as rumored. Also, I the frame lines might not be sufficiently accurate. >Yes, it is possible ( and probably more likely ) that the >corrections are in some software in the PC, not the camera. I did >not >think of that. > >I think you are wrong in your estimate of the "extension factor" . >The lens is, and always will be, a 135mm lens. It is not, nor >ever will be a 180. The field of view is what you are referring to >by using the (badly worded adaptation of the industry) crop >factor. If the RF base is the same as the M6, then the 135/3.4 >should focus correctly. > >No Speculation? .. isn't this the LUG? > >Frank Filippone >red735i@earthlink.net > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Regards, Dick