Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Douglas, No, don't think it quite does it. The Sutcliffe browns are deeper and often appear massed. What was the Sutcliffe original? I suggest that to try to assess the performance of this approach you would need to try the experiment again with a Sutcliffe location; attempting to photograph something pretty close to the original and then try matching the profiles. BTW which software are you using? PSE 4? At the risk of repeating myself, the quality of the Sutcliffe pictures has a lot to do with the combination of the process he used and the light at the time; which was often more hazy than now, resulting in a more luminous qualityto the air. Modern film, especially colour slide, responds to light in a wholly different way to that of Sutcliffe's processes. Peter Douglas Sharp wrote: > Been trying to find a decent way of converting to sepia - particularly > the sepia tones shown in Frank Meadow Sutcliffe pictures. > I think I may have found it - The stand alone, Pure Image, has an option > to match images to a colour profile. > Step 1 convert original image to BW (but still in RGB NOT Grayscale) > Step 2 Create a profile of a scanned Sutcliffe original > Step 3 Match BW shot to the profile > > Let me know what you think, > http://gallery.leica-users.org/New-Old-Pictures/Image1_2 > http://gallery.leica-users.org/New-Old-Pictures/Image1_2_BW_NR > > Cheers > Douglas > > Technical stuff : Leica M6, Canon 1,9/85mm (screw mount), Kodak > Ektachrome 400, > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >