Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I still own that lens, and it's served me well - but then I only worry about bokeh if it's ugly, and I don't feel that lens has ugly bokeh. But it's the very rare photographer who gives no thought to what the out-of-focus areas look like with a given lens - though they may not know the term for those areas. On 5/12/06 2:03 AM, "Nathan Wajsman" <nathan@nathanfoto.com> wrote: > But it is also held in high regard my many on the list, so it must be an > individual choice. I sold the 1.5/50mm Nokton after a few months. I > liked the lens in every respect, except that its bokeh was horrible. > That prompted me to sell it and go for the real thing, i.e. the Summilux. > > Nathan > > Marc James Small wrote: >> At 08:34 PM 5/11/06 +0100, Colin J wrote: >> >> >>> 2) Bokeh >>> >> >> With all respect, "bokeh" is a matter held in little regard by many of us >> on the List. To some, such as yourself, as it would appear, it is of >> import, but to many of us, it would not reach the radar screen as we see >> it >> as a fiction. It cannot be qauantified and therefore is not an issue. >> >> >> msmall@aya.yale.edu >> Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >>