Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In that case probably upgraded at the factory many were. Frank --- Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp@gmx.de> wrote: > In fact a very late IIIg, which for some unknown > reason has the serial > no. of a Ig from 1957 > Douglas > > Kenneth Frazier wrote: > > > > > On May 6, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > > > >> Pictures of all the above can be seen here: > >> http://wajsman.smugmug.com/gallery/1431737 > > > > > > Nice looking stuff, and I think Richard is right. > That's a IIIg. > > > > Ken > > ----------------------------------- > > The Rev. Kenneth Frazier > > Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ > > ---------------------------------- > > Current Leica Photography (PESO): > > http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r > > > > Current Medium Format Photos: > > http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug > for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for > more information >